ZilHaj 9, 1430 Hijri November 27, 2009

pakistan top flag
Paktribune - KSE at glance News Ticker :: Newsletter :: News Alerts :: Pakistan News Wire :: My Paktribune

 
 
 
 
 
 
Health
Sports
Business
Tribune Corner
Kashmir
Afghanistan
Features & Articles
Interviews
Capital Watch
Fence Sitters view
Power Point
Hockey WorldCup 2006
EarthQuake 2005
Polo World Cup
Asia Cup 2004
War on Terror
Balochistan & Gawadar
12th SAARC Summit
Karakoram Highway
Pakistan Day
Defence Day
Saf Games 2004
Privacy Policy
Copy Rights
About Us
Disclaimer
Contact Us
Advertising Info
 

Cartoon Coverage

 
 
 
 
 

SC rejects appeals of 2 LHC judges against contempt notices

Wednesday November 04, 2009 (1200 PST)


Email Most Popular
Print Add to Favorite

CJ Iftikhar opts out from PCO judges, Khosa cases
Dogar challenges contempt notice
SC serves contempt notices on 60 HC judges
PHC withdraws contempt of court notices against lawyers
SC can interfere if state organs transgress: CJ Iftikhar
More Related News >>
 Pictorial ,  No of Pictures: 12
 Speak Out
Bravo
 Opinion Poll Open
Created on August, 24 2007
Closed on December, 24 2007
Question: "Does the SC verdict in favour of the Sharif brothers means that finally our judiciary is totally independent?"
This poll has been closed, view the result of this poll.
Show Result

ISLAMABAD: While hearing contempt cases against judges who took oath under the Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO) in violation of a Supreme Court restraining order, the SC on Tuesday rejected the intra-court appeals of two Lahore High Court (LHC) judges challenging of contempt notices issued to them.

A five-member SC bench of Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday, Justice Nasirul Mulk, Justice Raja Fayyaz Ahmed, Justice Jawwad S Khawaja and Justice Ghulam Rabbani later adjourned the proceedings for an indefinite period.

In its written order, the bench held that the intra-court appeals filed by LHC Justice Hasnaat Ahmed Khan and Justice Shabbar Raza Rizvi making the federal government respondent under section 10 (2A) of the Contempt of Court Act 1976, were not liable to be entertained, as the Contempt of Court Act 1976 had been repealed by the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, which was a “valid law and has been accorded permanence by incorporation of Article 270AA in the constitution through 17th Amendment as well as the apex court”.

Earlier, the court decided to hear contempt of court cases against PCO judges after adjudicating upon the pending intra-court appeals of the two LHC judges. Justice Shabbar Raza Rizvi and Justice Hasnaat Ahmed Khan of the LHC had challenged the issuance of show-cause notices to them on contempt of court charges by the SC.

Both judges had contended that the July 31, 2009, verdict was announced without providing them an opportunity to clear their positions. They had requested the court to first decide their intra-court appeals and then adjudicate further, which the court had accepted.

Dr Khalid Ranjha, counsel for former LHC chief justice Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry, requested the court to first hear the reply/contentions of Justice (r) Abdul Hameed Dogar to the contempt notice and then move ahead with the appeals by other judges.

However, Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday asked Ranjha to argue his case, as his matter was different from that of Justice (r) Dogar.

End.

 
 
Google
 
Web paktribune.com

What do you think about the story?

No comments found

Send us your comments:

   

Name:

Your E-mail Address:

Your Country:

Comments Heading:

Comments:

Characters left


Note:The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality.

Back to Top      Archives 

Speak Out


Soul Vibes
Exclusively by Anwaar Hussain
Hoh, Oho!
If I were Taliban’s Advisor
View All Articles

 
 


Quick Vote

Question: "In order to uproot series of terrorist acts in Pakistan, which one of the following are you in favour of?"
By doing war
By having dialogue
Don`t Know
Pakistan News Service © PakTribune.com.